Ever-Lovin’ Blue-Eyed

We’ve reached the sev­enth day of the sec­ond annu­al Jack Kir­by Trib­ute Month, cre­at­ed by Howard Simp­son. A cool new aspect he’s intro­duced is themed weeks, where each day’s prompts fit with­in that theme.

If you’ve been fol­low­ing along, this week’s theme is the Fan­tas­tic Four. Today’s prompt is the Thing.

Ben Grimm as the Thing is a char­ac­ter who might appear fair­ly sim­ple and straight­for­ward on the sur­face, but if you’ve read the orig­i­nal run by Jack and Stan, you real­ize there’s more to him than meets the eye. He can be fun­ny, but there’s also under­ly­ing pain and regret, being stuck in this mon­strous form. Lat­er cre­ators have some­times lost that aspect, focus­ing more on the comedic elements.

The Thing is not an easy char­ac­ter to draw! I had a bit of a strug­gle here before I felt like I had it rea­son­ably correct.

Hope you approve. Tune in tomor­row to see who’s next!

4 thoughts on “Ever-Lovin’ Blue-Eyed

  1. joe musich

    Thanks Mark.
    I can see, once I gave it some thought, how the Thing would be dif­fi­cult to draw. The Kir­by style must be kept. And yet the “lego” blocks of his face and his body must take shape and keep the shape from pan­el to pan­el. But a lot is said with his eyes. And you do that.
    John­ny threw plen­ty of jabs at Ben, and Ben throw­ing them back was the insult com­e­dy. But as you point out, it was Ben’s pain that attract­ed this pre-teen, strug­gling as we all do with body changes, that held my atten­tion to the char­ac­ter. So I say “right on” to you for point­ing that out. Right out of the box, Jack and Stan had me hooked most­ly with The Thing. I have always won­dered if it was­n’t that char­ac­ter qual­i­ty that led to the X‑Men.
    Good one.

    Reply
    1. Mark Post author

      Glad you approve of my attempt here. Of all the char­ac­ters, the Thing seemed to be the one who took the longest to arrive at a final design. So obvi­ous­ly Kir­by him­self was grap­pling with it.
      And I think you’re right about there being a con­nec­tion between the Thing and the X‑Men, that sense of not fit­ting in that every­one goes through at that phase of grow­ing up that the read­er iden­ti­fied with. Same as Peter Park­er being the mis­fit and hard luck case, who did­n’t have as much as some of the oth­er kids.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *